Fraser Kelton, an entrepreneur, and writer of Disruptive Thoughts, has written the following post exclusively for SHARKRIDE.
_______________________________
Innovation is changing. The process itself is taking direction from its definition and is adapting to our changing world.
Traditionally, we’ve had manufacturer-centric innovation processes: companies innovated and launched new products, improved products, or created entirely new market segments. Occasionally a visionary individual, independent of an organization, would introduce a new innovation. However, these individual innovations still followed the manufacturer-centric innovation process – a company was formed around the innovation and grew with its success (an example is Henry Ford and the Ford Motor Company).
A number of innovative forces guide this form of innovation – internal industry experts, focus groups, market researchers, etc. There has been valuable discussion over the past few years about the challenges and limited return from this form of innovation.
Lots of smart people have discussed this issue and I’m not going to get into the benefits of the “Democratizing of Innovation” except to say that they’re real. And that the democratizing of innovation isn’t the change that is occurring. It’s simply an enabler of a greater change that is underway.
There’s another piece of the innovation of innovation puzzle that needs to be understood before we continue – the appearance, and rise, of specialization companies.
Innovation is not only being democratized, it’s also being segmented into specializations. These two enablers are introducing significant change to the innovation process.
So where’s innovation going? Here’s a quick summary of a number of changes that we’re going to observe during the coming years (I’ll expand and explore them further in the coming weeks/months at Disruptive Thoughts):
Innovation off of the balance sheet
P&G has made it a goal for 50 % of their innovation to come from outside sources. As they’ve worked towards this goal they’ve had fantastic results. The positive results will continue, other companies will follow the lead, and, the results will only get juicer thanks to…
The maturation of the matching process
A number of services have been developed that harness new technology to enable innovators to connect with interested organizations – literally creating a market for innovation. These markets, like any young and immature market, are inefficient (economist speak for far from perfect) but will improve over time. These markets are paving the way for…
The rise of specialized innovation companies
Increases in technology paired with falling prices, the creation of innovation markets, easy access to capital, etc. have made specialized innovation companies possible. Small groups (1 +) of experts of a specific technology can now focus on continually innovating within their area of expertise without worrying about the manufacturer-centric processes traditionally required to help monetize the innovation. Because of their size, expertise, etc. along with their distance from the commercialized product these companies will have a competitive advantage with respect to developing disruptive innovations and all other innovation that creates a new technological curve, rather than simply an upward improvement. However, because of their arms-length distance from end-users and the commercialized product these companies will have a disadvantage with respect to sustainable innovation. Sustainable innovation will be handled by…
The new role of an organization’s innovation process
Organizations who take substantial amounts of innovation off of their balance sheet will continue to have a role for internal innovation. It’s up to the organizations to develop the ability to rapidly integrate an external innovation into their system. Not only that, they’ll have to become hyper-efficient at producing sustainable innovations, internally, for their products. This will come from harnessing the power of democratized innovation and monitoring, and listening, to all of the new streams of information.
Other business processes have significantly changed and developed during the past decade(s) and the process of innovation has begun to, well, innovate. The change will bring substantial benefit to many. The real winners will be the large organizations and the small innovators who anticipate the change and adapt their processes quickly to harness the new innovation model. The losers, as always, will be those who are too blind with pride to adapt and open.
May 11th, 2006 at 7:31 pm
[…] You can check out my post on Innovating Innovation over at Sharkride. […]
May 11th, 2006 at 11:21 pm
Nice post. Some great ideas I haven’t thought about…
May 12th, 2006 at 2:36 am
Thanks. I love Sharkride, so I was pumped when Matt asked me to write a post for him.
And his top graphic is pretty damn cool.
May 12th, 2006 at 5:33 pm
I disagree slightly. Look at Apple, their innovation is in-house and is running rampant over several industries. I don’t think a company needs outsourced ideas as much as they need quality people constantly thinking ahead in-house.
May 12th, 2006 at 7:18 pm
Chad, nice example w/ Apple. Their ability to innovate and think ahead (and execute on that vision quickly) is really impressive.
I don’t think all companies will remove all internal innovation. In fact, I think all companies will continue to internally innovate. I do believe that all companies will look outward for innovation, which hasn’t occurred in the past.
And this is going to create great change to the innovation process.
May 18th, 2006 at 2:08 am
Fraser,
Nice article. You are on target with the changes that are happening with innovation these days. The companies that expect to meet their revenue targets through an organic innovation process will be left behind. P & G is the leader in this category, other major players include Innocentive and Ninesigma.
Regarding Apple, they used IDEO for many of their designs, including the mouse. Your friend Henry Ford also practiced outside innovation by copying the assembly line from Columbia bicycle. The greatness of many of the world’s best inventors is recognizing an exploitable opportunity.
June 26th, 2006 at 5:25 am
[…] Invention Capitalists. A specialization company fulfilling a critical element necessary for the innovation of innovation Myhrvold has no interest in manufacturing and marketing new products. His plan is to offload all of that work to licensees. […]
July 31st, 2007 at 10:17 am
sharkride.com - the most necessary site
Good day
I like your fine site - sharkride.com .
Thank you, I will add it to my bookmarks
Regards
Ismail
September 22nd, 2007 at 8:30 pm
[…] A couple must-read articles that discuss the rise of the “idea as a product.” Essentially, value is shifting from the ability to make something to the innovation itself, which relates to what Fraser talked about on SHARKRIDE here. See also his follow-up thoughts here. […]
April 11th, 2008 at 3:23 pm
лотерея миллион